Home > Things To Ponder > Capital Punishment

Capital Punishment

January 29, 2010 Leave a comment Go to comments


One of my classes is Critical Thinking.  As part of an exercise, I had to take a stance on capital punishment and then prove my position.  While capital punishment has nothing to do with a degree in business, the critical thinking aspect does.

Let me start by saying that I support the death penalty.  I think if you kill someone you should pay the highest consequence.  I understand there are times that people are convicted and they are innocent.  But with any system, there are failures.  If we stopped every process, procedure, or protocol based on the fact that there are failures, we’d have no rules or regulations.

Along with the exercise, I had to read an article about a man in Florida, Angel Diaz, who took an extra long time to die.  Opponents of the death penalty felt he unjustly suffered.  The length of the execution was due to a failure in the protocols for that state.  In Ohio, between 2006 and 2009 there were three cases where it took an inordinate amount of time for the prisoner to either be hooked up or to die.  In all cases, the failure stemmed from not finding a good vein or from improper administration of the drugs.

Opponents state that the prisoner has the right to a humane death, not one that causes pain.  It is alleged that prisoners are not receiving the proper anesthesia and when the drug that paralyzes the body is given, they are suffocating while awake.  If for some reason they make it through the first two rounds, it is said that the potassium chloride given to stop the heart creates burning and intense pain for the inmate.  According to a British medical journal, 43% of inmates from six states were given autopsies that proved the inmates may have been conscious.  MAY have been.  There is no definitive proof that they were.

There is an extreme lack of medical professionals willing or able to do the administering of the drugs in an execution.  I found conflicting information about whether or not this violates their medical oath and if they can lose their license.  One article stated that the AMA said it can’t be held against them while another said they could lose their entire careers.  It is known that they suffer extreme harassment from activists who oppose capital punishment.  As a result, people with little to no medical experience are administering powerful drugs.  Which leads to the prolonged death of inmate.

Another point not mentioned was the inmate’s health and medical history.  If you have a man who prior to imprisonment was a heavy drug user, there are bound to be issues with finding good flowing veins.  If you have a prisoner who is unhealthy, the same would apply.  Also, there are no reports that a doctor examined the prisoners to determine the effect of the drugs.  As with anything, every person metabolizes drugs (prescription or otherwise) in a different fashion.  I can knock back 10 Vicodin with little to no effect where my mom can’t take more than one without getting all goofy.  Some can smoke a bunch of meth yet another person may not be able to without overdosing.

After doing my research, I determined that I still am for the death penalty.  however, if we are going to have it, it must be done right.  Medical professionals, whether nurses or doctors, must be the ones giving the drugs.  There must be steps to determine a prisoner’s tolerance for certain types of drugs.

In my heart, I do not care if a man who has murdered a family feels pain when being executed.  It is what he gets.  But I also understand that under the letter of the law, he does deserve a humane execution.  Instead of abolishing capital punishment, it needs to be fixed.

It took me a bit to write my paper, these here are only my thoughts from my research.  But it has bugged me a bit and I wanted to see what others thought.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Categories: Things To Ponder
  1. January 29, 2010 at 5:39 pm | #1

    One question…were the people these criminals murdered given a “humane execution”?

    I am for the death penalty, and I think it should be painful. They should have fear in their final moments just like their victims did.

    Just my opinion.

  2. Amanda
    January 29, 2010 at 7:01 pm | #2

    Hi Jenera,
    I to am in the Critical Thinking class. I do not believe in the death penalty. I think it is better if they get life without parole. It cost more to put people on death row, and I think it is the easy way out. I think it is best for them to keep relive the moment and to let their memories haunt them for the rest of their lives.
    Although I did feel really bad about reading those two assigned papers. It did take a long time for him to die when normally it only takes 20-25 minutes.

    • January 29, 2010 at 9:47 pm | #3

      I could understand the extra cost though even that argument has conflicting information depending on who you talk to. However, I wonder just how many people sit in prison with regrets. Sure they may regret not living free but as far as regretting their crimes? My husband was in prison for a good portion of his life. While he regrets his decisions NOW, at the time, he merely passed along time until he got out.

      Now I imagine being on death row would change that a bit or serving life without parole. But at some point it would be a routine, every day life. I am not sure that it is punishment enough for taking another person’s life.

  3. January 30, 2010 at 10:09 am | #4

    I totally agree with you on this…every last detail! Were the people they killed given a painfree death? I really don’t understand how it can be cost effective to house and feed someone for forty years in prison as opposed to the death sentence though.Besides some people who are horrible enough to kill do it for pleasure anad won’t necessarily regret reliving it every single day.This is just my opinion without extensive research! I just hate that people take the lives of innocent people…the ones up for the death sentence are obviouslynot innocent.

  4. Amy
    January 30, 2010 at 11:59 am | #5

    I am against the death penalty. Technically, I probably do agree that if you kill somebody, then death is a fair punishment. I’m not even so sure that I feel badly that they may suffer, assuming of course that they tortured their victims before murdering them. But I’m against it for two reasons.

    First, like you said, the system isn’t perfect. Innocent people do get convicted of crimes they didn’t commit. And while spending your life in prison for a crime you didn’t commit is bad, it can at least eventually be undone. But dead is dead. I don’t think it’s worth it for one innocent person to die for a crime they didn’t commit, even though you get it right 99 out of 100 times. One is just too many.

    Second, it’s arbitrary who gets it. Yes, there are guidelines. But whether to seek the death penalty is up to the prosecutor, and it’s inconsistently applied. Somebody who killed one person can get it, while somebody who killed 20 won’t, for whatever reason – the prosecutor seeks it because he’s up for reelection, the victim’s family doesn’t believe in it, the prosecutor doesn’t want the expense and circus of a trial, the defendant had poor legal counsel, the jury was racist Who knows? If you seek it for the murderer of a family man, but not for the single woman, it’s almost as though you’re saying one life is more important than the other. They are either all equally important and their killers deserving of death, or not.

    • January 30, 2010 at 10:05 pm | #6

      Amy, you bring up a good point about how it decided who gets the death penalty. It should be something that says “if you do this, you get this”. It’s just another flaw in the system.

  5. Amanda
    January 31, 2010 at 8:41 am | #7

    Hi Suzicat,
    I had done a little extra research before I turned my paper in about capital punishment. There are several studies that show death row and just to put someone to death are higher than housing them without parole. Now I am not saying that I feel sorry for the ones on death row, I am just saying I don’t believe in the death penalty. Now there are some on death row who don’t regret the decisions they made. But still because of their actions they only get 30 minutes to an hour of outside, caged in exercise. The other 23 hours they sit in thier cell. This topic is very controversal. And I respect your opinion.

  6. February 1, 2010 at 1:52 pm | #8

    I agree to all you said. “An eye for and eye, a tooth for a tooth”. So all those who hurt their victims must pay. But we all know that even animals who are better put off than live deserve a painless execution. The system must review its facilities as well as the people tasked to deliver the coup de grace. Anyways, your observation will put more fear to the law violators.

  1. No trackbacks yet.